<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Attention-Economy on nbdawn's Blog</title><link>https://blog.nbdawn.com/tags/attention-economy/</link><description>Recent content in Attention-Economy on nbdawn's Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.163.3</generator><language>en</language><copyright>DJ.Kim 2025</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.nbdawn.com/tags/attention-economy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Bad Content Drives Out Good: Gresham's Law in the Age of Content Overflow</title><link>https://blog.nbdawn.com/posts/greshams-law-of-content/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.nbdawn.com/posts/greshams-law-of-content/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="bad-content-drives-out-good-greshams-law-in-the-age-of-content-overflow"&gt;Bad Content Drives Out Good: Gresham&amp;rsquo;s Law in the Age of Content Overflow&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The content market is flooded with bad stuff. Unverified falsehoods circulate as fact. Valueless mass-produced filler clogs every feed. Stolen work spreads farther than the original. Outrage and rage-bait vacuum up attention.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is usually where the lament begins — the age of depth is over, and so on. I suspect the opposite. Good content isn&amp;rsquo;t disappearing. It only &lt;em&gt;looks&lt;/em&gt; like it&amp;rsquo;s disappearing, buried under the bad. And buried is a very different thing from gone.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>